Wren Beta — what that means

vermontpublic.org

readable, with friction

C Acceptable. Readable, but working against you

Loading speed is diagnostic only; it does not affect this grade or search ranking.

SubjectWeightScore
Interruption 35.71% 60
Readability 28.57% 100
Accessibility and keyboard 21.43% 71
Stability and weight 14.29% 100

This letter rests on 100% of the grade. Every subject was measured, including article readability and accessibility. How this is worked out.

vermontpublic.org
Largest paint
1.7s
Paywall
none
Ad requests
33
Tracker requests
35
Page weight
607 KB
Readability
18px type · 1.5 line height · 65 characters per line · 12.6:1 contrast
Accessibility
4 automated checks failed (4 serious)
Green hosting
not measured
Measured
2026-10-07

Observed interruptions

Ad and tracker counts above are network requests, not counts of visible ads or separate companies. They do not affect the interruption score.

Assessed 3 sampled pages. The largest detected ad area was 1.9% of a sampled viewport. Verified prompts: Full-screen box you have to close first.

This is a sample, not a promise that the whole site has no interruptions. Ad detection can miss formats and content outside the sampled view. Older scans did not check visibility or overlapping ad rectangles as thoroughly. The score uses the strongest observed deduction, so one panel is not penalized under multiple names. How interruptions are scored.

The type, and who can use it

Measured on 3 rendered pages; latest measurement 2026-10-07. Every number is a mechanical fact about the page, not a judgment of its design.

WhatMeasuredThe bar
Body type size 18px 16px, the browser default
Characters per line 65 45–90
Line height 1.50 1.5 (WCAG 1.4.8)
Text contrast 12.6:1 4.5:1 (WCAG AA), 7:1 (AAA)
Text column 55% of the window at least 45%
Reflows at phone width yes WCAG 1.4.10
Dark mode no noted, not scored
Automated accessibility checks 4 automated checks failed (4 serious): aria-input-field-name, color-contrast, frame-title, link-in-text-block WCAG 2.1 A and AA, via axe-core
Keyboard no trap; focus visible on 100% of stops never trapped, always visible
Structure main landmark, 1 h1, no skipped heading levels a main landmark, one h1, no skips
Alt text 50% of 4 content images described every content image
Reader mode parses parses (Firefox’s Readability)

Automated accessibility checks catch an estimated 30–40% of real problems, so “no automated violations detected” is a floor, not a certificate. We never say “accessible”. How these are scored.

Recorded automated findings

Recorded behaviorPolicy costUse in this grade
Full-screen box you have to close first 0.40 Strongest verified cost only

These records are retained for inspection. Only verified interruption evidence contributes to that subject; uncertain records are not silently treated as clean. Metering keeps its separate grade cap. These costs are not currently applied as search-ranking multipliers.

Measurement dates

Oldest evidence 13 days old. Dates refer to the evidence, never the card rebuild.

Measurement history

Earlier dated observations are not available on this report card. Current subject dates are listed above; previous grades cannot be reconstructed from them.

How we know

Pages rendered3
Site verdicterrors dropped; majority of remaining; ties to the stricter verdict; active reviewed exclusions override admission
Figures shownnumeric measurements generally use medians; interruption costs, overflow, keyboard traps and accessibility failures retain the strongest observed finding
Cited by218 encyclopedia articles

Think this is wrong? It may well be — the measurements cover only a handful of pages. Any reviewed admission decision and its dated evidence are shown above. Re-measurement on request is not built yet, so there is no button here that would do anything. When it exists it will be free and it will be on this page.