thestage.co.uk
excluded from the index
Why it is excluded — reviewed decision
This exclusion follows a reviewed decision. Reviewed 2026-09-10T17:37:35.284733+00:00 by the owner.
The sampled review requires sign-in or account creation before the advertised allowance of five free articles.
Gate G2: Hard registration wall — no content at all without an account.
- https://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/megasquirt-fully-loaded-review-underbelly-cowgate-edinburgh-ashley-blair-drew-reilly — observed 2026-09-10T02:56:46.378Z: The sampled review requires sign-in or account creation before the advertised allowance of five free articles.
Underlying automated verdict: pass, measured 2026-08-31T20:56:30.013Z. Review reference: registration-20260909-thestage.co.uk.
- Largest paint
- 1.9s
- Paywall
- none
- Ad requests
- 0
- Tracker requests
- 2
- Page weight
- 27 KB
- Readability
- not measured
- Accessibility
- not measured
- Green hosting
- not measured
- Measured
- 2026-08-31
Observed interruptions
Ad and tracker counts above are network requests, not counts of visible ads or separate companies. They do not affect the interruption score.
Interruption evidence is incomplete or needs review, so this subject is not scored. Missing evidence is not treated as an interruption-free page.
Measurement dates
Oldest evidence 50 days old. At least one subject is due for rechecking (30 days or older). Dates refer to the evidence, never the card rebuild.
- Access and interruptions:
Measurement history
Newest 5 saved observations. Each describes a sampled page at that time; older, failed or held observations do not override the current reviewed card. Raw automated findings may have been superseded by later review or detector replay. No previous grade is inferred.
Read dated observations
- — Readability and accessibility observation; prose source p; desktop type 16px; phone overflow not observed
https://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/megasquirt-fully-loaded-review-underbelly-cowgate-edinburgh-ashley-blair-drew-reilly
Evidence source: readability-completion-2026-09-09.jsonl · observation d09db1df8c92 - — Readability and accessibility observation; measurement failed
https://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/megasquirt-fully-loaded-review-underbelly-cowgate-edinburgh-ashley-blair-drew-reilly
Evidence source: readability-top5000.jsonl · observation 0779c5f6bd40 - — Access observation: error; review required
https://www.thestage.co.uk/review-round-ups
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation a21871e96ed5 - — Access observation: error; review required
https://www.thestage.co.uk/ao-d-f-t-link
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation a701798dc897 - — Access observation: penalised; raw automated findings metered paywall; review required
https://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/megasquirt-fully-loaded-review-underbelly-cowgate-edinburgh-ashley-blair-drew-reilly
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation 382284e52e3e
How we know
| Pages rendered | 3 (2 failed and were discarded) |
|---|---|
| Site verdict | Reviewed exclusion; underlying automated rollup: errors dropped; majority of remaining; ties to the stricter verdict; active reviewed exclusions override admission |
| Figures shown | numeric measurements generally use medians; interruption costs, overflow, keyboard traps and accessibility failures retain the strongest observed finding |
| Cited by | 3,533 encyclopedia articles |
| Flagged | at least one render was degraded, so this card is queued for re-measurement |
Think this is wrong? It may well be — the measurements cover only a handful of pages. Any reviewed admission decision and its dated evidence are shown above. Re-measurement on request is not built yet, so there is no button here that would do anything. When it exists it will be free and it will be on this page.