Wren Beta — what that means

statbroadcast.com

readable, with friction

C Acceptable. Readable, but working against you

Loading speed is diagnostic only; it does not affect this grade or search ranking.

SubjectWeightScore
Interruption 35.71% 65
Readability 28.57% not scored
Accessibility and keyboard 21.43% 70
Stability and weight 14.29% 100

This letter rests on 71% of the grade. Readability was measured but is not scored here. We have not measured an article for this site. Homepages, listings and other non-article pages can make our typography measurements reflect navigation rather than prose. The numbers are below; the letter leaves them out until we have measured an article. How this is worked out.

statbroadcast.com
Largest paint
0.8s
Paywall
none
Ad requests
78
Tracker requests
40
Page weight
802 KB
Readability
14px type · 1.5 line height · 36 characters per line · 1.2:1 contrast (over an image)
Accessibility
2 automated checks failed (2 serious)
Green hosting
not measured
Measured
2026-09-01

Observed interruptions

Ad and tracker counts above are network requests, not counts of visible ads or separate companies. They do not affect the interruption score.

Assessed 1 sampled page. The largest detected ad area was 0% of a sampled viewport. Verified prompts: Cookie dialog blocks the page, with no refuse button.

This is a sample, not a promise that the whole site has no interruptions. Ad detection can miss formats and content outside the sampled view. Older scans did not check visibility or overlapping ad rectangles as thoroughly. The score uses the strongest observed deduction, so one panel is not penalized under multiple names. How interruptions are scored.

The type, and who can use it

Measured on 1 rendered page; latest measurement 2026-09-05 — no article measured yet. Every number is a mechanical fact about the page, not a judgment of its design.

WhatMeasuredThe bar
Body type size 14px 16px, the browser default
Characters per line 36 45–90
Line height 1.49 1.5 (WCAG 1.4.8)
Text contrast 1.2:1 — over a background image, so not scored 4.5:1 (WCAG AA), 7:1 (AAA)
Text column 18% of the window at least 45%
Reflows at phone width yes WCAG 1.4.10
Dark mode no noted, not scored
Automated accessibility checks 2 automated checks failed (2 serious): color-contrast, image-alt WCAG 2.1 A and AA, via axe-core
Keyboard no trap; focus visible on 76% of stops never trapped, always visible
Structure main landmark, 0 h1, no skipped heading levels a main landmark, one h1, no skips
Alt text 50% of 2 content images described every content image
Reader mode parses parses (Firefox’s Readability)

Automated accessibility checks catch an estimated 30–40% of real problems, so “no automated violations detected” is a floor, not a certificate. We never say “accessible”. How these are scored.

Recorded automated findings

Recorded behaviorPolicy costUse in this grade
Cookie dialog blocks the page, with no refuse button 0.35 Strongest verified cost only

These records are retained for inspection. Only verified interruption evidence contributes to that subject; uncertain records are not silently treated as clean. Metering keeps its separate grade cap. These costs are not currently applied as search-ranking multipliers.

Measurement dates

Oldest evidence 50 days old. At least one subject is due for rechecking (30 days or older). Dates refer to the evidence, never the card rebuild.

Measurement history

Newest 2 saved observations. Each describes a sampled page at that time; older, failed or held observations do not override the current reviewed card. Raw automated findings may have been superseded by later review or detector replay. No previous grade is inferred.

Read dated observations
  1. — Readability and accessibility observation; prose source p; desktop type 14.1px; phone overflow not observed
    https://www.statbroadcast.com/
    Evidence source: readability-top5000.jsonl · observation e569b3281715
  2. — Access observation: penalised; raw automated findings consent wall
    https://statbroadcast.com/
    Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation 11d45a08c5e2

How we know

Pages rendered1
Site verdicterrors dropped; majority of remaining; ties to the stricter verdict; active reviewed exclusions override admission
Figures shownnumeric measurements generally use medians; interruption costs, overflow, keyboard traps and accessibility failures retain the strongest observed finding
Cited by1,561 encyclopedia articles

Think this is wrong? It may well be — the measurements cover only a handful of pages. Any reviewed admission decision and its dated evidence are shown above. Re-measurement on request is not built yet, so there is no button here that would do anything. When it exists it will be free and it will be on this page.