efight.jp
excluded from the index
- Largest paint
- 1.1s
- Paywall
- none
- Ad requests
- 116
- Tracker requests
- 72
- Page weight
- 1.6 MB
- Readability
- not measured
- Accessibility
- not measured
- Green hosting
- not measured
- Measured
- 2026-09-01
Observed interruptions
Ad and tracker counts above are network requests, not counts of visible ads or separate companies. They do not affect the interruption score.
Interruption evidence is incomplete or needs review, so this subject is not scored. Missing evidence is not treated as an interruption-free page.
A sampled page triggered a popup, blocking-interstitial or audible-autoplay gate. The interruption score needs review; those findings are not treated as quiet browsing.
Why it is excluded
| Gate | What tripped |
|---|---|
| G6 | Sound-on autoplay |
A site that fails any of these is not indexed at all — not ranked lower, absent. It keeps this page, and the measurement that produced the verdict stays visible.
Measurement dates
Oldest evidence 50 days old. At least one subject is due for rechecking (30 days or older). Dates refer to the evidence, never the card rebuild.
- Access and interruptions:
Measurement history
Newest 3 saved observations. Each describes a sampled page at that time; older, failed or held observations do not override the current reviewed card. Raw automated findings may have been superseded by later review or detector replay. No previous grade is inferred.
Read dated observations
- — Access observation: excluded; detected gates G6
https://efight.jp/news-20260831_1736870
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation da7daae85f50 - — Access observation: pass
https://efight.jp/news-20260831_1736872
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation 11191a1c83b6 - — Access observation: excluded; detected gates G6
https://efight.jp/news-20260831_1736957
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation 70bbfdbcb3f9
How we know
| Pages rendered | 3 |
|---|---|
| Site verdict | errors dropped; majority of remaining; ties to the stricter verdict; active reviewed exclusions override admission |
| Figures shown | numeric measurements generally use medians; interruption costs, overflow, keyboard traps and accessibility failures retain the strongest observed finding |
| Cited by | 1,535 encyclopedia articles |
Think this is wrong? It may well be — the measurements cover only a handful of pages. Any reviewed admission decision and its dated evidence are shown above. Re-measurement on request is not built yet, so there is no button here that would do anything. When it exists it will be free and it will be on this page.