abendblatt.de
excluded from the index
- Largest paint
- 0.4s
- Paywall
- hard paywall
- Ad requests
- 1
- Tracker requests
- 4
- Page weight
- 389 KB
- Readability
- not measured
- Accessibility
- not measured
- Green hosting
- not measured
- Measured
- 2026-09-01
Observed interruptions
Ad and tracker counts above are network requests, not counts of visible ads or separate companies. They do not affect the interruption score.
Interruption evidence is incomplete or needs review, so this subject is not scored. Missing evidence is not treated as an interruption-free page.
Why it is excluded
| Gate | What tripped |
|---|---|
| G1 | Hard paywall — the content requires payment |
A site that fails any of these is not indexed at all — not ranked lower, absent. It keeps this page, and the measurement that produced the verdict stays visible.
Recorded automated findings
| Recorded behavior | Policy cost | Use in this grade |
|---|---|---|
| Cookie dialog blocks the page, with no refuse button | 0.35 | Needs review; not scored |
These records are retained for inspection. Only verified interruption evidence contributes to that subject; uncertain records are not silently treated as clean. Metering keeps its separate grade cap. These costs are not currently applied as search-ranking multipliers.
Measurement dates
Oldest evidence 50 days old. At least one subject is due for rechecking (30 days or older). Dates refer to the evidence, never the card rebuild.
- Access and interruptions:
Measurement history
Newest 3 saved observations. Each describes a sampled page at that time; older, failed or held observations do not override the current reviewed card. Raw automated findings may have been superseded by later review or detector replay. No previous grade is inferred.
Read dated observations
- — Access observation: penalised; raw automated findings consent wall; review required
https://www.abendblatt.de/politik/article413020051/wahl-in-sachsen-anhalt-warum-ist-die-afd-im-osten-staerker-als-im-westen.html
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation 0166f72ac2b2 - — Access observation: excluded; detected gates G1; raw automated findings consent wall
https://www.abendblatt.de/schleswig-holstein/pinneberg/article412991331/insolvenz-schock-bei-beliebtem-italienischen-lokal-casa-di-campo-in-quickborn-das-steckt-dahinter.html
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation f116bb1c0875 - — Access observation: excluded; detected gates G1; raw automated findings consent wall
https://www.abendblatt.de/niedersachsen/landkreis-harburg/article413020588/unfall-mit-5-fahrzeugen-auf-der-a1-dann-kracht-es-auf-der-gegenseite.html
Evidence source: verdicts-top5000.jsonl · observation 687df68b76ad
How we know
| Pages rendered | 3 |
|---|---|
| Site verdict | errors dropped; majority of remaining; ties to the stricter verdict; active reviewed exclusions override admission |
| Figures shown | numeric measurements generally use medians; interruption costs, overflow, keyboard traps and accessibility failures retain the strongest observed finding |
| Cited by | 1,651 encyclopedia articles |
| Flagged | at least one render was degraded, so this card is queued for re-measurement |
Think this is wrong? It may well be — the measurements cover only a handful of pages. Any reviewed admission decision and its dated evidence are shown above. Re-measurement on request is not built yet, so there is no button here that would do anything. When it exists it will be free and it will be on this page.